Is carbon dating the truth hungarian dating site
This value of 0.2 p MC is very close to the value of 0.195 p MC found within Figure 1.
About nine half-lives would have to elapse for a starting value of 100 p MC to decrease to 0.2 p MC.
Sensitive instruments called acceleration mass spectrometers (AMS) are used to count the C/C ratio in a sample drops below 0.001 p MC?
(We could “round up” the value of 0.0007 p MC at 17 half-lives to 0.001 p MC, but the 0.00038 p MC at 18 half-lives is definitely below the detection threshold.) Since each half-life is 5,730 years, this means that no C has even been detected in diamonds, which some scientists claim are billions of years old!
Radioisotope dating methods involving the heavier, longer-lived isotopes (methods such as uranium-lead, potassium-argon, etc.) are one of the main justifications that evolutionists use to argue for such vast ages.
How is it that Evolutionist can’t wrap their heads around this?
#carbon14 #creation” username=””]Cosmic rays (mainly high-energy protons) trigger a process in the atmosphere that changes atmospheric nitrogen into C is 5,730 years.
When today’s rates are used to calculate ages from certain radioisotope ratios, the results indicate that billions of years’ worth of nuclear decay of the heavier radioisotopes has occurred.